Renormalization and embedded Julia sets within the Mandelbrot set

Get acquainted with the phenomenon of embedded Julia sets in an interactive session with the web application Juliette.



To do: implement x e p t 0 1 2 3 m.


Mathematical explanation of renormalization is under construction ...

Embedded Julia sets were observed and named in the 1990s by Robert Munafo and Jonathan Leavitt \cite{mrob99, leav}. These are subsets of $\M$ resembling a quadratic Julia set. See the examples in Figures~\ref{F10b} and~\ref{F3wd}. It turns out that each embedded Julia set is associated to two small Mandelbrot sets: first, it is contained in a decoration of a small Mandelbrot set $\M_p$ and it looks similar to the small Julia sets $\K_c^p$ for parameters $c$ nearby. Second, it is somewhat symmetric about another small Mandelbrot set $\M_m$\,, which shall be called the tiny Mandelbrot set in this context. The embedded Julia set is denoted by $\K_\sM^{m,\,p}\subset\M$\,; of course the periods $m$ and $p$ do not specify $\M_m$\,, $\M_p$\,, and $\K_\sM^{m,\,p}$ uniquely, but they must be supplemented with parameter values or external angles. Now what is the mechanism producing $\K_\sM^{m,\,p}$\,? In 2008 the author obtained the combinatorial construction and the asymptotic geometry at non-parabolic parameters, as well as the similarity results in Theorem~\ref{T3}, but this was published only in preliminary form in Demo Section~5 of Mandel \cite{mandel} and remained unknown; the discoveries of \cite{kk} are completely independent. Probably the combinatorial approach is simpler for quadratic polynomials and gives more classes of examples, while the analytic approach of \cite{DBDS, kk} will be more easily adapted to general one-parameter families of rational maps. See demo 5 of Mandel.